Call for Editorial Board and Peer Review Committee Members for the New Journal of IndianResearchers.Com

We are excited to announce the launch of the Journal of IndianResearchers.Com, a new platform dedicated to advancing research and scholarship across various disciplines in India. As we prepare for our inaugural issue, we are actively seeking distinguished academics, researchers, and professionals to join our Editorial Board and Peer Review Committee. This is a unique opportunity to contribute to the growth of a premier journal that aims to foster high-quality research and academic discourse.

Editorial Board Members

Roles and Responsibilities

Strategic Oversight

Editorial Board Members will play a critical role in shaping the journal’s strategic direction and ensuring that it adheres to the highest standards of academic excellence. This includes setting editorial policies, defining the journal’s scope, and guiding the overall vision and mission of the journal.

Manuscript Review

Members are expected to assist in the review process by evaluating submitted manuscripts for quality, originality, and relevance. They will provide constructive feedback to authors and recommend revisions to improve the overall quality of published research.

Peer Review Coordination

Editorial Board Members will help coordinate the peer review process by recommending qualified reviewers, managing the review process, and ensuring timely feedback. They will work closely with the Peer Review Committee to uphold the integrity and rigor of the review process.

Promotion and Advocacy

Board Members are also responsible for promoting the journal within their professional networks and advocating for its mission. They will help in attracting high-quality submissions and increasing the journal’s visibility within the academic community.

Qualifications

• A Ph.D. or equivalent in a relevant field.
• Demonstrated expertise and a strong publication record.
• A commitment to maintaining high ethical standards in academic publishing.
• Experience in editorial work or peer review is preferred.

Peer Review Committee Members

Roles and Responsibilities

Manuscript Evaluation

Peer Review Committee Members are tasked with providing thorough and unbiased evaluations of submitted manuscripts. This involves assessing the quality, originality, and significance of research, as well as ensuring that the methodology and results are sound.

Constructive Feedback

Members will provide detailed and constructive feedback to authors to help them improve their manuscripts. This feedback should be aimed at enhancing the clarity, coherence, and scholarly contribution of the research.

Timely Reviews

It is crucial for Peer Review Committee Members to complete reviews within the deadlines provided. Timely feedback helps maintain the efficiency of the publication process and supports authors in a timely manner.

Confidentiality

Committee Members must uphold the confidentiality of the review process. All information related to the manuscripts and the review process should be kept private and not disclosed to unauthorized parties.

Qualifications

• A Ph.D. or equivalent in a relevant field.
• A strong track record of research and publication.
• Experience in reviewing academic papers is advantageous but not required.
• Ability to provide objective, detailed, and constructive feedback.

How to Apply

Interested candidates are invited to submit their applications via the Google Form link https://forms.gle/BsPMUsDSRYpKB6kn8. Please include the following in your application:

• A detailed CV highlighting your academic qualifications and professional experience.
• A brief statement of interest outlining your motivation for joining the Editorial Board or Peer Review Committee.
• Contact information for at least two professional references.

Journal of IndianResearchers.Com: Editorial and Review Policy

Introduction

The Journal of IndianResearchers.Com is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity, transparency, and quality in its publishing practices. In alignment with Scopus Q1 standards, we have established the following editorial and review policies to ensure the credibility and excellence of the research we publish. This policy outlines the procedures for manuscript submission, peer review, editorial decision-making, and ethical considerations.

1. Manuscript Submission

1.1 Submission Requirements

• Originality: Manuscripts must be original contributions and not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
• Formatting: Submissions should adhere to the journal’s formatting guidelines, which are detailed on our website.
• Cover Letter: Authors must include a cover letter that clearly states the significance of the research and confirms that the manuscript is not being submitted to any other journal.

1.2 Author Responsibilities

• Authorship: All authors must meet the criteria for authorship, including substantial contributions to conception, design, analysis, and interpretation of data.
• Conflict of Interest: Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that might be perceived to influence the research or its interpretation.
• Ethical Compliance: Research involving human or animal subjects must comply with ethical guidelines, and appropriate approvals must be provided.

2. Peer Review Process

2.1 Review Criteria

• Relevance and Originality: Manuscripts are assessed based on their relevance to the field and the originality of the research.
• Methodology: The robustness of the methodology and appropriateness of the research design are critical factors.
• Results and Interpretation: Reviewers evaluate the validity of the results and the soundness of the interpretation and conclusions.

2.2 Reviewer Selection

• Expertise: Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the manuscript’s subject area. They are invited based on their published work and academic credentials.
• Confidentiality: Reviewers must maintain confidentiality regarding the manuscripts and associated details.

2.3 Review Process

• Double-Blind Review: We use a double-blind review process where both the reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other.
• Timeliness: Reviewers are expected to provide their evaluations within the timeframe specified by the journal. Delays should be communicated promptly.

3. Editorial Decision-Making

3.1 Decision Criteria

• Editorial Review: The Editor-in-Chief or handling editor performs an initial review to assess the manuscript’s suitability for peer review based on scope and quality.
• Review Feedback: Decisions are made based on reviewers’ feedback, considering their recommendations for acceptance, revision, or rejection.

3.2 Decision Types

• Accept: Manuscripts that meet all criteria and receive positive reviews may be accepted with minimal revisions.
• Revise and Resubmit: Manuscripts that require modifications will be sent back to authors for revisions. A revised manuscript will be re-evaluated.
• Reject: Manuscripts that do not meet the journal’s standards or have fundamental flaws may be rejected.

3.3 Appeals

• Appeal Process: Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a formal request for reconsideration, providing new evidence or clarifications.

4. Ethical Guidelines

4.1 Plagiarism and Fraud

• Detection: All submitted manuscripts are checked for plagiarism and academic misconduct using advanced detection tools.
• Action: Cases of plagiarism or data fabrication will result in immediate rejection and may lead to a formal report to the author’s institution.

4.2 Research Ethics

• Human and Animal Rights: Research involving human participants or animals must have received appropriate ethical approvals and be conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines.
• Consent: In studies involving human subjects, informed consent must be obtained, and this must be stated in the manuscript.

4.3 Conflicts of Interest

• Disclosure: Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any conflicts of interest that may affect the impartiality of the review or publication process.
• Management: Conflicts of interest will be managed in accordance with the journal’s policies to ensure transparency and fairness.

5. Publication Policies

5.1 Fees and Royalties

• Publication Fees: The Journal of IndianResearchers.Com does not charge any fees for manuscript submission, processing, or publication. We are committed to providing free access to research for the benefit of the academic community and the public.
• Royalties: Authors will not receive royalties for the publication of their articles. The journal operates under an open-access model with no financial compensation for authors, ensuring that research remains freely accessible to all.

5.2 Corrections and Retractions

• Corrections: Minor errors in published articles will be corrected through errata or corrigenda.
• Retractions: Articles found to have significant errors or ethical issues will be retracted with a clear notice explaining the reasons.

5.3 Copyright and Licensing

• Copyright Transfer: Authors must transfer copyright to the journal upon acceptance of their manuscript.
• Open Access: The journal adheres to an open-access model to ensure that research is freely accessible to the global community.

5.4 Data Sharing

• Availability: Authors are encouraged to share data and materials associated with their research to support reproducibility and transparency